The Gay Rebellion — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   54
Chambers, Robert W. (Robert William), 1865-1933, Frederick, Edmund, 1870-1949 [Illustrator] Project Gutenberg 2009 Not confirmed
Science fiction Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 50,070
Reading time 218 min
Text sections 7

Before opening The Gay Rebellion — Text and Context, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 50,070 words, 3 hr 38 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 14.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Science fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Chambers frames this 1913 collection as a mock-serious contribution to eugenics science, pairing a satirical preface with romantic tales of a 'gay rebellion' against declining marriage rates. The excerpts reveal a tension between the author's flippant scholarly pose and the earnest, even melancholic, courtship of a blind heroine and a lord.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Clergymen were in a pitiable condition for lack of fees and teas; the marriage license bureau was open only Mondays and Saturdays; the social columns of the newspapers were abolished. All over the Union young men were finding time hanging heavy on their hands after business hours because there was little to do now that every town had its Franchise Clubs magnificently fitted with every requisite that a rapidly advancing sex could possibly demand.

The pressure upon the men of the Republic was becoming tremendous; but, as everybody knows, they held out with a courage worthy, perhaps, of a better cause, and women were still denied the franchise in the face of impending national disaster.

But the Central Federation of Amalgamated Females was to deliver a more deadly blow at man than any yet attempted, a blow that for cruelty and audacity remains unparalleled in the annals of that restless sex.

As everybody now knows, this terrible policy was to be inaugurated in secret; a trial was to be made of the idea in New York State; neither the state nor federal governments had the faintest suspicion of what impended; not a single newspaper had any inkling.

Even Augustus Melnor, owner and editor of that greatest of New York daily newspapers, the _Morning Star_, continued to pay overwhelming attention to his personal appearance, confident that the great feminine revolt was on its last shapely legs, and that once more womankind would be kind to any kind of mankind, and flirt and frivol and marry, and provide progeny, and rock the cradle as in the good old days of yore.

So it happened one raw, windy day in May, Mr. Melnor entered his private office in the huge _Morning Star_ building, in an unusually cheerful frame of mind and sent for the city editor, Mr. Trinkle.

"An exceedingly pretty girl smiled at me on my way down town, Trinkle," he said exultantly. "That begins to look as though the backbone of this suffragette strike was broken. What?"

"You've got a dent in your derby; it may have been that," said Mr. Trinkle.

Mr. Melnor hastily removed his hat and punched out the dent.

"I'm not so sure it was that," he said, flushing up.

Mr. Trinkle gazed gloomily out of the window.

For an hour they talked business; then Mr. Melnor was ready to go.

"How are my nephews getting on?" he asked.

"Something rotten," replied Mr. Trinkle truthfully.

"What's the matter with 'em?"

"Everything--except a talent for business."

"You mean to say they exhibit no aptitude?"

Mr. Melnor seized his overcoat from the hook.

Mr. Trinkle offered to hold it for him. The offer irritated the wealthy owner of the _Star_, who suspected that the city editor meant to intimate that he, Mr. Melnor, was too old to get into his own overcoat without assistance.

"Never mind!" he said ungratefully. He fussed at the carnation in his buttonhole, picked up his doggy walking stick, glanced over his carefully pressed trousers and light coloured spats, strolled across to the mirror, and leisurely drew on his new gloves.

"Mr. Trinkle," he began more complacently, "what I want you to always bear in mind is that my pup nephews require a thorough grilling! I want you to bully 'em! Suppress 'em! Squelch, nag, worry, sit on 'em!"

"I have," said the city editor with satisfaction. "They loathe me."

"Do it some more, then! I won't permit any nepotism in this office! If you don't keep after 'em they'll turn into little beastly journalists instead of into decent, self-respecting newspaper men! Have either of my nephews attempted to write any more poetry for the Saturday supplement?"

"Young Sayre got away with some verses."

"Wha' d'ye do with 'em?" growled Mr. Melnor.

"_Printed_ them! Are--you--craz-y?"

"Don't worry. Sayre got no signature out of me."

"But _why_ did you print?"

"Because those verses were too devilish good to lose. You must have read them. It was that poem _Amourette_."

"Did _he_ do _that_?"

"Yes; and the entire sentimental press of the country is now copying it without credit."

"My nephew wrote _Amourette_?" repeated Mr. Melnor with mingled emotions.

"He sure did. That poem seemed to deal a direct blow at this suffragette strike. Several women subscribers sent in mash notes. I had a mind to take advantage of one or two myself."

Pride and duty contended in the breast of Augustus Melnor; duty won.

"That's what I told you!" he snapped; "those pups will begin to write for the magazines if you don't look out!"

"Well _I_ tell _you_ that they've no nose for news--no real instinct--and they might as well write for the backs of the magazines."

Robert W. Chambers opens The Gay Rebellion with a preface that addresses a hypothetical future reader—a young woman reading aloud to her husband by the fire—and a foreword that solemnly presents the book as a contribution to the science of eugenics. The juxtaposition is deliberately jarring: the intimate, old-fashioned domestic scene contrasts with the mock-academic tone and the Latin epigraph from Ovid, “Facta canam; sed erunt qui me finxisse loquantur” (“I will sing of deeds; but there will be those who say I have invented them”). The title itself, with its period sense of “gay” meaning lighthearted or festive, signals a playful rebellion against the era’s anxieties about falling birth rates and the rise of suffragette unions.

A Mock-Serious Scholarly Frame

The foreword and preface establish a layered authorial persona. Chambers dedicates the book to Suzanne Carroll with a poem that admits “I’m no poet” and jokes about “gay scoffers,” while the foreword claims the work is an “important contribution” to eugenics data. The Latin motto warns that readers may accuse him of fabrication—a hint that the stories to follow are not to be taken as literal scientific reports. This framing device sets up a tension between earnest social commentary and ironic detachment, inviting readers to question how seriously to take the tales of romantic rebellion against demographic trends.

Courtship Under a Shadow

In the excerpted narrative, a young woman sits sewing by a window behind heliotrope and mignonette, waiting for a man named Marque. Their conversations are halting, filled with unspoken fears. She accepts only half the fish he catches; he worries about a doctor who visits her regularly. The prose dwells on sensory details—the “pink-throated bird singing of Paradise,” the “brook talking in golden tones”—while the woman’s inner thoughts reveal a dread that “the end of things was drawing very near.” The climax of the passage comes when she asks, “Lord Marque, why do you not go back to England?” The revelation of his title and her blindness (she gropes for a cane after lowering the shade) reframes the entire courtship as a delicate negotiation between two people carrying secrets.

The Blind Heroine and the Reluctant Lord

The woman’s blindness is disclosed not through direct statement but through action: after Marque leaves, she “bent over and groped on the floor for something” and then “leaning on her rubber-tipped cane, walked to the door.” Earlier, she had “folded her hands” and “gazed steadily at nothing” when he mentioned the doctor. Her blindness is a structural secret, withheld from the reader until the moment it becomes narratively necessary. Marque, meanwhile, is revealed as a lord—a detail that recasts his earlier hesitation and her question about England as loaded with class and distance. The story uses physical barriers (the window, the flowers) and sensory language (the dusk moths, the sunset colors) to create a romance that is both intimate and obstructed, where what is unseen matters as much as what is spoken.

Readers should note that the excerpts represent only a portion of one story within a collection. The preface’s address to a future married couple suggests Chambers expects his audience to share the old-fashioned sensibility he invokes, but the foreword’s mock-scientific posture complicates any straightforward reading. Pay attention to how Chambers balances irony with genuine pathos, and how the framing devices color the romantic episodes that follow.

There’s something touching about how Chambers hides his tenderness behind a scientific smirk, especially with that blind heroine. It makes me think of a quieter, stranger book where the heart of things hides beneath the surface too — The House on the Borderland — Story, Setting & Ideas — and how both feel like love letters written in code.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Take a moment to reflect on this book

Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks